Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGatchel, Robert J.en
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-15T17:12:48Zen
dc.date.available2009-10-15T17:12:48Zen
dc.date.issued2004-09en
dc.identifier.citationPublished in Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, v. 14, no. 3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/1917en
dc.descriptionAuthor's final draft after peer review, also known as a post print.en_US
dc.description.abstractWhat has plagued the evaluation process in this area has been the level of agreement in the wide variation in the measures used to document a construct such as pain, as well as changes in that construct as reflected in the measurement of function. The present article reviews the major psychosocial barriers to assessment/recovery that have been implicated as influencing the self-assessment of function. The following are discussed: secondary gain; secondary loss; emotional distress (such as anger, anxiety and depression); psychopathology; somatization and symptom magnification; compliance and resistance; patient comprehension/mental status; and iatrogenic effects.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe writing of this paper was supported in part by Grants from the National Institutes of Health (2K02 MH1107, 2R01 DE10713, 3R01 MH46452) and from the Department of Defense (PRO 23002)en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.subjectbiopsychosocialen_US
dc.subjectdisabilityen_US
dc.subjectfunctionen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.titlePsychosocial Factors That Can Influence the Self-Assessment of Functionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Psychology, The University of Texas at Arlington.en_US
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescriptionThe original publication is available at article DOI.en
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:JOOR.0000022761.95103.f8


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record