Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDyer, Danny D.en
dc.contributor.authorHensley, Onas L.en
dc.contributor.authorKeating, Jerome P.en
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-03T16:08:58Zen
dc.date.available2010-06-03T16:08:58Zen
dc.date.issued1977-08en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/2296en
dc.description.abstract**Please note that the full text is embargoed** ABSTRACT: There are available several point estimators of the percentiles of a normal distribution with both mean and variance unknown. Consequently, it would seam appropriate to make a comparison among the estimators through sums "closeness to the true value" criteria. Along these lines, the concept of Pitman-closeness efficiency is introduced. Essentially, when comparing two estimators, the Pitman-closeness efficiency gives "odds" in favor of one of the estimators being closer to the true value than is the other in a given situation. Through the use of Pitman-closeness efficiency, this paper compares (a) the maximum likelihood estimator, (b) the minimum variance unbissed estimator, (c) the best invariant estimator, and (d) the median unbiased estimator within a class of estimators which includes (a), (b), and (c). Mean squared efficiency is also discussed.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTechnical Report;67en
dc.subjectFatigue lifeen
dc.subjectPitman-closeness efficiencyen
dc.subjectMean squared efficiencyen
dc.subjectPoint estimatorsen
dc.subject.lcshStatisticsen
dc.subject.lcshMathematics Researchen
dc.titleComparison of Point Estimators of Normal Percentilesen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Mathematicsen


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record