Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAthappan, Annabrabha
dc.contributor.authorSumitsawan, Sulak
dc.contributor.authorGangupomu, Roja Haritha
dc.contributor.authorKositkanawuth, Ketwalee
dc.contributor.authorParikh, Parthen
dc.contributor.authorAfotey, Benjamin Nmai
dc.contributor.authorSule, Neelesh
dc.contributor.authorKalidindi, Sahithi Raj
dc.contributor.authorSattler, Melanie L.
dc.contributor.authorWeatherton, Yvette Pearson
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-19T22:03:57Z
dc.date.available2016-12-19T22:03:57Z
dc.date.issued2013-08
dc.identifier.citationPublished in the Journal of Environmental Protection 4: 123-141, 2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn2152-2219
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/26312
dc.description.abstractSurface coating facilities are major sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in urban areas. These VOCs can contribute to ground-level ozone formation, and many are hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), including xylene, ethylbenzene, and toluene. This project was conducted in order to provide information for updating the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), USA, permit by rule for Surface Coating Facilities. Project objectives were: 1) To develop a database of information regarding surface coating facilities in Texas; 2) To estimate maximum emission rates for various VOC species from surface coating facilities in Texas; 3) To conduct dispersion modeling to estimate off-site impacts from surface coating facilities. The database was developed using 286 TCEQ permit files authorizing surface coating facilities in Texas during 2006 and 2007. The database was designed to include information important for estimating emission rates, and for using as inputs to the dispersion model. Hourly and annual emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particulate matter (PM), and exempt solvents (ES) were calculated for each permitted entity/ company in the database, according to equations given by TCEQ. Dispersion modeling was then conducted for 3 facility configurations (worst-case stack height, good practice stack height, and fugitive emissions), for urban and rural dispersion parameters, for 8-hour and 24-hour operating scenarios, and for 1-hour, 24-hour, and annual averaging times, for a total of 36 scenarios. The highest modeled concentrations were for the worst-case stack height, rural dispersion parameters, 24-hour operation scenario, and 1-hour averaging time. 108 specific chemical species, which are components of surface coatings, were identified as candidates for further health impacts review.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Research Publishingen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) -- Urban areasen_US
dc.subjectVolatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) -- Texasen_US
dc.subjectSurface coating facilities -- Texasen_US
dc.subjectTexas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ)en_US
dc.subjectHazardous Air Pollutants -- Emissionsen_US
dc.subjectDispersion Modelingen_US
dc.titleVolatile Organic Compound Emissions from Surface Coating Facilities: Characterization of Facilities, Estimation of Emission Rates, and Dispersion Modeling of Off-Site Impactsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescriptionThe original publication is available at Article DOIen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.48A101


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States