Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHoefer, Richard
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Kristin
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-07T23:05:24Z
dc.date.available2017-11-07T23:05:24Z
dc.date.issued2007-03
dc.identifier.citationPublished in The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare 34(1) Article 6: 83-108, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/27060
dc.description.abstractThe Federal regulation-writing process is vital to understanding how laws are translated into policy. This paper re-examines data on human services interest groups active in lobbying the executive branch to determine what factors influence their effectiveness. Building on findings from Hoefer (2000), structural equation modeling is used to re-analyze the original regression model of interest group effectiveness (IGE) on a sample of 127 Washington D.C.-based interest groups. Results indicate that some of the previous findings are not supported and an alternative model is proposed. A group's position, context and access to information and policymakers emerge as significant determinants of IGE. Access also mediates the impact of a group's strategy and position on IGE. Implications for practice and future research are provided.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSocial Work at ScholarWorks at Western Michigan Universityen_US
dc.subjectRegulation -- writing process -- Federalen_US
dc.subjectInterest group effectiveness (IGE)en_US
dc.subjectStructural equation modelingen_US
dc.subjectHuman services interest groups -- lobbying -- effectivenessen_US
dc.titleControlling the Levers of Power: How Advocacy Organizations Affect the Regulation Writing Processen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Social Work, The University of Texas at Arlingtonen
dc.identifier.externalLinkhttp://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol34/iss1/6
dc.identifier.externalLinkThe original publication is available at the journal homepageen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record