Geomechanical Analysis of Rock Brittleness with Comparisons to the Mineralogical Brittleness Index
Abstract
A significant area of research within the Oil and Gas industry centers around the understanding of rock brittleness and fracture mechanics related to inducing and extending hydraulic fractures. This study defines rock brittleness as the fracture density, or the fracture surface area per unit volume (m-1), at a particular strain state.
The first goal of this research was to test whether or not the strain conditions of various rock layers were constant using a geomechanically derived equation,
𝐹𝑑𝐾𝐼𝑐24𝜇2(1+𝑣)=𝐴𝑣1−2𝑣+𝐵,
where Fd is fracture density, Kic is fracture toughness, u is the shear modulus, v is Poisson’s Ratio, and A and B are functions of the strain invariants. If the strain states were similar, the results would plot as a straight line with a positive slope. Analysis of the collected samples consisted of acoustic testing for P and S-wave velocities as well as mercury intrusion porosimetry for density and porosity. Fracture density measurements and samples were taking at three separate locations: Palo Duro Canyon, TX, Bighorn Basin, WY, and along Highway 90 in Del Rio, TX.
The second goal was to compare the geomechanical definition of brittleness with a mineralogical brittleness definition commonly used in the industry. The mineralogical content of each sample was estimated using X-Ray Diffraction and then used to calculate the Brittleness Index (Wang and Gale, 2009) which was compared with the Geomechanical Brittleness. Since the geomechanical brittleness equation is based on fracture mechanics, the mineralogical brittleness should correlate with the geomechanical brittleness. If it doesn’t the mineralogical brittleness should be modified or discarded.
Using the Geomechanical Brittleness equation, the data from Palo Duro, TX produced a positive correlation of 0.9701, indicating that the strain was constant through each layer. It was determined that a correlation can’t be definitively established for samples from Bighorn Basin, WY due to limited sampling. Finally, a poor correlation coefficient of 0.005 from the Highway 90 Road Cuts in Del Rio, TX indicates that the samples from were either subjected to different strain states or deformed beyond their tensile strength. The results for the geomechanical brittleness and mineralogical brittleness comparisons show that there is a strong positive correlation of 0.99 for the Palo Duro Canyon, TX samples. The results for Bighorn Basin, WY and Del Rio, TX suggest that the geomechanical brittleness does not correlate with the mineralogical brittleness, both yielding a low correlation coefficient.
Because of the inconclusive correlation for two of the study locations, additional analysis is recommended for the samples from Del Rio, TX and Bighorn Basin, WY.
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A Geomechanical Equation For Fracture Density/brittleness And Comparisons With A Mineralogical Brittleness Index
Zastoupil, Louis BrettAs production of hydrocarbons from tight reservoirs becomes more prevalent, the need to understand fracture density and what can affect fracture density has become the goal of new research. In this study, fracture density ... -
FRACTURE DENSITY AND BRITTLENESS OF THE MESOZOIC FORMATIONS EXPOSED ON THE CANADIAN ESCARPMENT OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO
Moore, Scott Alexander; 0000-0002-1682-2530 (2018-07-02)Production of hydrocarbons from tight and unconventional reservoirs has become so prevalent, the need to understand rock fracture mechanics has become increasingly important. A specific research goal is the need to understand ... -
EXPERIMENTAL CONSTRAINTS ON THE MICROMECHANICS OF BRITTLE FRAGMENTATION DURING EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE
Barber, Troy J; 0000-0001-7210-9038 (2016-12-09)Various fault damage fabrics, from gouge in the principal slip zone, to fragmented and pulverized rocks in the fault damage zone, have been attributed to brittle deformation at high strain rates during earthquake rupture. ...