Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLind, Melissa Susanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-23T01:56:36Z
dc.date.available2007-08-23T01:56:36Z
dc.date.issued2007-08-23T01:56:36Z
dc.date.submittedAugust 2006en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-1406en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/384
dc.description.abstractBecause of their large size, defined benefit pension plans are an important component of U.S. corporate finances and capital markets. The value of pension plans comprises a sizable portion of the sponsoring firm's assets and impacts the sponsoring firm's profitability and risk. Plan funding status has a direct impact on firm earnings. Corporate sponsors of overfunded plans may reduce or eliminate cash contributions to the plan, improving earnings. In contrast, underfunded plans require large expedited contributions that lower earnings. Plan investment choices may magnify the effect of funding on earnings when markets are volatile and managers invest a greater portion of plan assets in equities. Prior pension research suggests managers utilize pension regulations and pension insurance to integrate pension cash flows with the firm's financial policies. Firm characteristics and managerial incentives are thus strong determinants of funding policies. Five pension policy propositions are examined to help explain the corporate decision making process.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGallo, Johnen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherBusiness Administrationen_US
dc.titleDefined Benefit Pensions: Funding And Asset Allocation Choicesen_US
dc.typePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairGallo, Johnen_US
dc.degree.departmentBusiness Administrationen_US
dc.degree.disciplineBusiness Administrationen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.degree.namePh.D.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record