Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEarnest, Marykathrynen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-03T21:52:56Z
dc.date.available2011-03-03T21:52:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-03
dc.date.submittedJanuary 2010en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-10967en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/5502
dc.description.abstractEarly modern perceptions of oceanic space diverged from standard perceptions of nature on land (or land-nature) because oceans presented a different type of wilderness. Because oceans defied early modern definitions of nature, they refused to support the developing mechanistic approach in the way that land-nature did. My argument begins with a chapter exploring science and nature in the early modern period. My second chapter expands this demonstration with an exploration of The Tempest. Shakespeare's self-reflexivity and exploration of boundaries in representing islands and oceans exemplifies their liminal position within nature. In my final chapter, I examine Margaret Cavendish's The Blazing World to examine how the liminal position of oceans within the humankind-nature paradigm necessitated a hybrid mechanistic-organic relationship and representation. These explorations illuminate how oceans, as an extraterrestrial space distanced from traditional, terrestrial nature, constituted a different kind of natural phenomenon and contributed to a global mentality.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTigner, Amy L.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEnglishen_US
dc.titleAn Ecocritical Exploration Of The Unique Nature Of Early Modern Oceans In The Blazing World And The Tempesten_US
dc.typeM.A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairTigner, Amy L.en_US
dc.degree.departmentEnglishen_US
dc.degree.disciplineEnglishen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.degree.nameM.A.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record