Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBatheja, Amanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-11T20:48:27Z
dc.date.available2011-10-11T20:48:27Z
dc.date.issued2011-10-11
dc.date.submittedJanuary 2011en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-11241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/6158
dc.description.abstractThe onset of the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression just months before the 2008 presidential election is thought to have played a significant role in voting behavior. Yet the extent to which voters followed traditional economic voting patterns in choosing between Barack Obama and John McCain is less clear. Using exit poll data merged with state-level aggregate economic data, we search for evidence that negative shifts in economic status made voters more likely to support Obama. After controlling for various demographic, partisan, and geographic variables, we find that voters who believed that the economy was the top issue in the election were more likely to support Obama unless their state experienced a sizeable increase in real personal income per capita in the 6-12 months or year prior to the election.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDesimone, Jeffreyen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEconomicsen_US
dc.titleToo Big To Fail: Economic Voting And The 2008 Electionen_US
dc.typeM.A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairDesimone, Jeffreyen_US
dc.degree.departmentEconomicsen_US
dc.degree.disciplineEconomicsen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.degree.nameM.A.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record