Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBelhadi, Chawki Ahmeden_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-16T18:19:42Z
dc.date.available2009-09-16T18:19:42Z
dc.date.issued2009-09-16T18:19:42Z
dc.date.submittedJanuary 2009en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-10362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/1774
dc.description.abstractThis purpose of the study was to bring more definition to the "problem" of occupational sex segregation, specifically why male-dominated occupations like engineering, firefighting, and the military still remain sex segregated. The study attempted to do so by integrating two findings: 1) the finding that women in male-dominated occupations are more dominant than women in female-dominated occupations, and 2) the finding that facially masculine women are more dominant than facially submissive women. Facial photos of women from occupations that are at least 90% male dominated and at least 90% female dominated were culled from the internet and rated for their level of facial masculinity. A variety of objective facial metrics was also measured. Of the total number of measures, only rated facial masculinity and eye-mouth-eye angle (EmE) proved significant across occupational category. Results were discussed in the context of both evolutionary and non-evolutionary theories of occupational sex segregation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipShelton, Beth Anneen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherSociologyen_US
dc.titleThe Facial Masculinity Of Women In Sex Segregated Occupationsen_US
dc.typeM.A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairShelton, Beth Anneen_US
dc.degree.departmentSociologyen_US
dc.degree.disciplineSociologyen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.degree.nameM.A.en_US
dc.identifier.externalLinkhttp://www.uta.edu/ra/real/editprofile.php?onlyview=1&pid=1419
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescriptionLink to Research Profiles


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record