Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKribs, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorCrisosto, Nicolas M.
dc.contributor.authorCastillo-Chavez, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorWirkus, Stephen
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-20T20:21:36Z
dc.date.available2014-08-20T20:21:36Z
dc.date.issued2010-07
dc.identifier.citationPublished in Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B 14(1):17-14, 2010en_US
dc.identifier.issn1553-524X
dc.identifier.issn1531-2492
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/24547
dc.description.abstractThis paper introduces a simplified dynamical systems framework for the study of the mechanisms behind the growth of cooperative learning in large communities. We begin from the simplifying assumption that individual-based learning focuses on increasing the individual's "fitness" while collaborative learning may result in the increase of the group's fitness. It is not the objective of this paper to decide which form of learning is more effective but rather to identify what types of social communities of learners can be constructed via collaborative learning. The potential value of our simplified framework is inspired by the tension observed between the theories of intellectual development (individual to collective or vice versa) identified with the views of Piaget and Vygotsky. Here they are mediated by concepts and ideas from the fields of epidemiology and evolutionary biology. The community is generated from sequences of successful "contacts'' between various types of individuals, which generate multiple nonlinearities in the corresponding differential equations that form the model. A bifurcation analysis of the model provides an explanation for the impact of individual learning on community intellectual development, and for the resilience of communities constructed via multilevel epidemiological contact processes, which can survive even under conditions that would not allow them to arise. This simple cooperative framework thus addresses the generalized belief that sharp community thresholds characterize separate learning cultures. Finally, we provide an example of an application of the model. The example is autobiographical as we are members of the population in this "experiment".en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF Grant #DMS-9977919); National Security Agency (NSA Grant #MDA 904-00-1-0006); Sloan Foundation: Cornell-Sloan National Pipeline Program in the Mathematical Sciences; the Office of the Provost of Cornell University; Los Alamos National Laboratory (T-Division); and the Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost of Arizona State University.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Mathematical Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectPopulation biologyen_US
dc.subjectCooperative learningen_US
dc.subjectBackward bifurcationen_US
dc.titleCommunity resilience in collaborative learningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.publisher.departmentMathematics Department, University of Texas at Arlington; Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Texas at Arlington; Laboratoire de Biometrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558 Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, France
dc.identifier.externalLinkhttp://www.aimsciences.org/journals/displayArticles.jsp?paperID=5139en_US
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescriptionThe original publication is available at the journal homepageen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record