Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcCullough Brewer, Danaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-31T22:10:11Z
dc.date.available2015-07-31T22:10:11Z
dc.date.submittedJanuary 2015en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-13108en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/25067
dc.description.abstractThis project examines representations of motherhood in Caldecott and Newbery winners from 1980-2014 and is informed by feminist literary theory, juvenile literary theory, and motherhood studies. While motherhood studies are evolving to consider egalitarian ideas of motherhood and multiple definitions of motherhood, many Caldecott and Newbery Medal winners present a traditional (and antiquated) motherhood ideal in which maternal figures tend to domestic duties and provide selfless nurturing of children. This objectification depersonalizes, essentializes, and stereotypes motherhood. Diverse mothering characters and practices do materialize in some texts but are often regulated by the motherhood ideal. In Chapter 2, I define the Caldecott motherhood ideal by analyzing a pre-1980 Caldecott text (Sylvester & the Magic Pebble), and then I use award winners from 1980-2014 to demonstrate the continued presence of the motherhood ideal. I contend that the texts in Chapter 2 essentialize motherhood by associating it with femaleness, and they prescribe homogenized mothering experiences. In Chapter 3, I define the motherhood ideal exemplar in Newbery texts (specifically Jacob Have I Loved and Shiloh). In this chapter, I clarify the case for acculturation in juvenile literature. In Chapter 4, I define "diverse" mothering experiences depicted in the Newbery texts from 1980-2014 as found in The Tale of Despereaux; Flora & Ulysses; Kira-Kira; Out of the Dust; Dear Mr. Henshaw; Dead End in Norvelt; and When You Reach Me. The texts in Chapter 4 demonstrate that emphasizing the action of mothering rather than promoting a naturalness allows for progressive and/or non-traditional mothering. Still, the texts in this chapter demonstrate that the motherhood ideal becomes a reactionary force against diverse mothering practices and limits the possibility for fictional explorations of egalitarian parenting. In Chapter 5, I argue that the motherhood ideal prescribes resolutions for mother/daughter conflicts in Jacob Have I Loved, When You Reach Me, Kira-Kira, and Flora & Ulysses. I contend that Walk Two Moons rejects the motherhood ideal myth as it explores maternal anxieties. In Chapter 6, I analyze replacement mothers and temporary mothers in A Gathering of Days; Sarah, Plain and Tall; Bud, Not Buddy; and The Higher Power of Lucky.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMorris, Timen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEnglishen_US
dc.titleConstructing Mothering Performances: The Motherhood Ideal In Caldecott And Newbery Winners, 1980-2014en_US
dc.typePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairMorris, Timothy R.en_US
dc.degree.departmentEnglishen_US
dc.degree.disciplineEnglishen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
dc.degree.namePh.D.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record