Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBergstrand, Kelly
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-06T16:28:45Z
dc.date.available2020-11-06T16:28:45Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn2378-0231
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/29584
dc.description.abstract**Please note that the full text is embargoed** ABSTRACT: The role of grievances in drawing public concern and activist support is a surprisingly understudied topic in modern social movement literature. This research is the first to parse issues into core components to understand whether some grievances are more successful than others in evoking reactions that can benefit social movements. Specifically, I use concepts and measures developed by affect control theory scholars that tap into cultural perceptions of the goodness or badness of behaviors and identities to investigate how people react to different configurations of good or bad perpetrators, behaviors, and victims in mobilizing events. I find strong support, across outcomes, that evaluations of goodness and badness in grievances affect people’s willingness to care about an issue or support a campaign. This provides insights into both the types of movements more likely to be successful as well as the types of social problems less likely to draw public support. [This is a published version of an article published by SAGE Publications in Socius. © The Author(s) 2019. Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions DOI: 10.1177/2378023119841811]en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (Socius);Volume 5: 1– 15
dc.subjectaffect control theoryen_US
dc.subjectsocial movementsen_US
dc.subjectgrievancesen_US
dc.subjectprotesten_US
dc.subjectmoralityen_US
dc.titleThe Advantaged Cause: Affect Control Theory and Social Movementsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record