Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStvan, Laurel Smith
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-23T16:30:06Z
dc.date.available2022-03-23T16:30:06Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationStvan, Laurel Smith. 2013. “Stress Management: Corpus-Based Insights into Vernacular Interpretations of Stress.” Communication & Medicine 10 (1): 81–93.en_US
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.1558/cam.v10i1.81
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/30271
dc.description.abstract**Please note that the full text is embargoed** ABSTRACT: Examination of the term stress in naturally occurring vernacular prose provides evidence of three separate senses being conflated. A corpus analysis of 818 instances of stress from non-academic texts in the Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA) and the Corpus of American Discourses on Health (CADOH) shows a negative prosody for stress, which is portrayed variously as a source outside the body, a physical symptom within the body and an emotional state. The data show that contemporary speakers intermingle the three senses, making more difficult a discussion between doctors and patients of ways to ‘reduce stress’, when stress might be interpreted as a stressor, a symptom, or state of anxiety. This conflation of senses reinforces the impression that stress is pervasive and increasing. In addition, a semantic shift is also refining a new sense for stress, as post-traumatic stress develops as a specific subtype of emotional stress whose use has increased in circulation in the past 20 years.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEquinoxen_US
dc.subjectlinguistics, corpus linguistics, medical humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectpolysemy, public health, terminology, health literacyen_US
dc.subjectstressen_US
dc.titleStress management: Corpus-based insights into vernacular interpretations of "stress"en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record