THE EFFECTS OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE STIMULATION (TENS) USING DIFFERENT PARAMETERS AND SITE PLACEMENTS ON PERCEPTION OF PAIN IN CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN PATIENTS
Author
Chidester, Kara Leigh
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
A study was conducted using 10 participants and the effects of using a
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) unit to treat chronic lower back pain.
Participants were required to have lower back pain for more than three months out of the
year and the pain to be non-specific (could not be clinically diagnosed by a healthcare
provider). The study focused on comparing the analgesic effects of applying TENS pads
directly to the area of concern (Lower back/Gate-control) verses placing them on a kidney
meridian point (Kidney meridian/Endogenous). To test this, participants were pseudorandomly placed into one of two categories: the Lower back/Gate-control (LBGC) or
Kidney meridian/Endogenous opiate (KMEO) and given different parameters to set their
TENS unit.
During the first and last week of the study, participants filled out a PROMIS-29
v1.0 and Global Rate of Change Scale to measure patients’ subjective data. This data was
collected and analyzed at the end of the third week. Both groups demonstrated some overall
improvement with a reduction in pain, improvement of physical function, decrease in
fatigue, and less pain interference; however, only the meridian group demonstrated a
statistically significant decrease in pain intensity and fatigue. This suggested that placing
the TENS pads on a meridian location and using an endogenous opiate setting rather than
placing pads directly on the site of pain with a gate control setting, has a larger reduction
in pain intensity and fatigue indicating a decreased perception in pain.
Previous research by Chesterton and colleagues (2002; 2003) demonstrated that pad
placement and TENS parameters matter. When placing the pads on the meridian and
stimulating the body’s natural endogenous opiate mechanism, longer lasting pain relief was
experienced. The results of our study supported the findings in Chesterton (2002; 2003)
indicating that more effective TENS treatments are experienced when pad placement and
parameters are experienced together.
There were two limitations of our study including a small sample size and corrupted
data for our physical range of motion measurements.