Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStvan, Laurel Smith
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-24T20:22:11Z
dc.date.available2022-09-24T20:22:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-23
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/30991
dc.description.abstract**Please note that the full text is embargoed** ABSTRACT: In assessing a popular Open Educational Resource that instructs and is shaped by students, I weigh the costs for both instructors and students in using classroom Wikipedia editing assignments. Based on experiences from before and during the Covid era, I assess the ROI in instructor time and attention, reviewing what has worked best or been a struggle for editing projects aimed at expanding linguistics stubs. Successfully launching these engaged learning tasks encompasses two areas: filling Wikipedia content gaps and building student skills. Content gap concerns include finding relevant page topics for students to work with; recognizing constraints on biography pages (Wagner et al. 2016); seeking appropriately copyrighted graphics (Qaiser et al. 2022); and using the modularity of pages on minority languages. Student research and technology skill concerns entail supporting students in sharing new knowledge; managing instructor time to track students’ training on the wiki editing tools along with their existing content assignments; using the benefits of groupwork to practice library skills training (Stvan 2021); and integrating the WikiEdu interface with other online course tools.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectWikipedia, faculty labor, OERen_US
dc.titleDeliberations before running another Wikipedia editing assignmenten_US
dc.typePresentationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record