Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFay, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.advisorMatheson, Neill
dc.creatorTolle, Andrew Ryan
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-28T14:27:27Z
dc.date.available2023-06-28T14:27:27Z
dc.date.created2021-08
dc.date.issued2021-08-16
dc.date.submittedAugust 2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/31359
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation applies posthuman theories to the concept of nurture in American literatures of 1880-1920 and 1980-2020 to explore how writers construct and imagine futurities that increasingly critique the liberal Cartesian human. While relationships between “subjects” and “objects” in Cartesian dualism can render the act of nurturing both problematic and violent, posthuman nurture decenters the nurturer, shifting focus onto the nurtured. This allows us to view nurture as an inherently mutual act that includes agencies beyond humans, including animals, plants, and other non-zoe. American literatures of 1880-1920, which often speculated futures taking place in 1980-2020, exhibit nascent strains of the “posthuman condition,” decentering the human to nurture utopian futures. Marginalized authors during 1880-1920, such as queer and BIPOC writers, offer “subaltern futures” as alternatives to utopias written by white writers, in which kinnovation becomes a form of nurturing futures from which they were otherwise excluded. Once writers of 1980-2020 experienced and/or lived past those futures imagined one century prior, their texts reimagine what utopias can realistically entail; this leads to an emergent form of fiction that explores posthuman (and post-human) nurturing ethics, particularly those relating to the figure of the child. Moreover, writers of 1980-2020 develop ways of blending biogenetic and nonbiogenetic kinship networks, allowing kinnovation to remain responsive to issues related to the “primal wound” that are emphasized by the voices of adoptees, former foster youth, and first parents. This dissertation explores how challenges to the capitalist unit of “The Family” appear in American literatures and how relationships of power influence acts of nurture. Authors examined include Edward Bellamy, Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Alice Ilgenfritz Jones & Ella Merchant, Edward Prime-Stevenson, S. Alice Callahan, Lillian Jones Horace, Frances E. W. Harper, Lydia Millet, and Joanne Ramos.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectPosthumanism
dc.subjectNurture
dc.subjectAmerican literature
dc.subjectAgency
dc.subjectNew materialism
dc.subjectIntra-actions
dc.subjectFuturity
dc.subjectUtopia
dc.subjectDystopia
dc.subjectAdoption
dc.subjectFoster care
dc.subjectSurrogacy
dc.subjectParenting
dc.subjectReproduction
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectQueer theory
dc.subjectBellamy
dc.subjectNineteenth century
dc.subjectDigital revolution
dc.subjectSubject
dc.subjectObject
dc.subjectKinship
dc.subjectTemporality
dc.subjectEvolution
dc.subjectProgressive era
dc.subjectSubaltern
dc.titlePOSTHUMAN NURTURING IN AMERICAN LITERARY FUTURITIES
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.updated2023-06-28T14:27:27Z
thesis.degree.departmentEnglish
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Arlington
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy in English
dc.type.materialtext
dc.creator.orcid0000-0003-0902-7384
local.embargo.terms2023-08-01
local.embargo.lift2023-08-01


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record