Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Piper Crispen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-08T02:31:13Z
dc.date.available2008-08-08T02:31:13Z
dc.date.issued2008-08-08T02:31:13Z
dc.date.submittedApril 2008en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-2052en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/960
dc.description.abstractThe obstetrical hoax perpetrated by Mary Toft in eighteenth-century England is worth the further attention of English scholars, not only because numerous literary texts are inspired by or linked to the incident, but also because existing studies frequently simplify this contemporary cultural fascination by associating it with theories of monstrosity. In this paper, I demonstrate that attempts to examine the rabbit births through the lens of monstrosity are complicated by the imprecise nature of language and the multiple meanings of the term monstrous, while attempts at objective observation are frustrated and deconstructed by satirists, by other scientists, and even by the object of the experiment. Using Donna Haraway's and Joanna Picciotto's theories to analyze primary scientific and satirical texts surrounding the Toft incident, my thesis introduces terms and research methods that may promote additional inquiry into an event which influenced eighteenth-century reproductive theories and challenged existing systems of epistemology.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSmith, Johannaen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherEnglishen_US
dc.titleFalling Into The Rabbit Hole: Monstrosity, Modesty, And Mary Toften_US
dc.typeM.A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairSmith, Johannaen_US
dc.degree.departmentEnglishen_US
dc.degree.disciplineEnglishen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.degree.nameM.A.en_US
dc.identifier.externalLinkhttps://www.uta.edu/ra/real/editprofile.php?onlyview=1&pid=1495
dc.identifier.externalLinkDescriptionLink to Research Profiles


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record