Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSchug, Kevin A.
dc.creatorThacker, Jonathan B.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-29T20:58:39Z
dc.date.available2019-08-29T20:58:39Z
dc.date.created2018-08
dc.date.issued2018-08-10
dc.date.submittedAugust 2018
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/28655
dc.description.abstractCarbohydrate analysis has many important implications in health, consumer products, and industrial processes. Among many possible analytical techniques for their analysis, mass spectrometry (MS) is an attractive approach, offering high sensitivity and specificity. In particular, electrospray ionization (ESI)-MS affords several advantages over other ionization techniques: the ability for direct coupling with upstream chemical separation techniques, its suitability for quantitation, and its compatibility with relatively inexpensive quadrupole mass analyzers for the analysis of high molecular weight compounds. However, the sensitivity of ESI-MS towards carbohydrates tends to be much less than for other classes of compounds, such as peptides. This is due to their lack of easily protonable or deprotonable chemical groups as well as their high hydrophilicities. Increasing an analyte’s sensitivity in ESI-MS can be achieved by optimizing detection strategies and solvent parameters. Flow injection analysis-ESI-tandem MS (MS/MS) was used to investigate the influence of solvent parameters on the signal intensity of glucose. Solvent parameters explored included the organic solvent and its ratio to water, the additive and its concentration, and solution pH. The use of ammonium trifluoroacetate in 80:20 methanol:water in the positive ionization mode resulted in the highest signal intensities. It was also found that acetonitrile suppressed ionization in the positive ionization mode. The effects of solvent parameters on the relationship between response factors and concentrations was also studied for glucose, sucrose, and raffinose using a continuous stirred tank reactor coupled to ESI-MS/MS. This technique is able to generate a continuum of response factors across a wide concentration range from a single injection. The profiles and magnitudes of the response factor vs. concentration profiles varied widely, and were dependent upon the ionic species monitored and the solvent parameters used. Monitoring acetate, chloride, and formate adducts resulted in the best linearities, useful for quantitative analysis. Lastly, liquid chromatography-ESI-MS/MS was used to determine the concentrations of fructose, glucose, and sucrose in hard cider and apple juice samples. The method was validated with respect to selectivity, linearity, the limit of detection, the limit of quantitation, accuracy, and precision. Notably, a correlation was found between the fructose and glucose concentrations in hard cider samples that did not contain detectable amounts of sucrose (n=9; R2=0.98).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectSugar
dc.subjectCarbohydrates
dc.subjectHydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography
dc.subjectElectrospray ionization
dc.subjectResponse factor
dc.subjectSolvent parameter
dc.subjectFlow injection analysis
dc.subjectContinuous stirred tank reactor
dc.subjectGlucose
dc.subjectSucrose
dc.subjectFructose
dc.subjectCider
dc.subjectApple juice
dc.subjectAdducts
dc.titleSEPARATION, DETECTION, AND QUANTITATION OF UNDERIVATIZED CARBOHYDRATES USING LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY- ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION-TRIPLE QUADRUPOLE- TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY
dc.typeThesis
dc.degree.departmentChemistry and Biochemistry
dc.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy in Chemistry
dc.date.updated2019-08-29T21:00:48Z
thesis.degree.departmentChemistry and Biochemistry
thesis.degree.grantorThe University of Texas at Arlington
thesis.degree.levelDoctoral
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Philosophy in Chemistry
dc.type.materialtext


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record