Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTorrey, Angela Bethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-08-08T02:31:10Z
dc.date.available2008-08-08T02:31:10Z
dc.date.issued2008-08-08T02:31:10Z
dc.date.submittedApril 2008en_US
dc.identifier.otherDISS-2027en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10106/940
dc.description.abstractGiven the increase in Hollywood celebrities running for political office and the young adult population's cultural tendency to glorify the lives of celebrities, this research explored tenets of the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to determine whether celebrity status acts as a peripheral cue that makes thoughtful engagement of political candidates and their stances unlikely in young adult's voting decisions. Indeed, the results of this study found that celebrity status does serve as such a cue, in many cases making it more likely that a celebrity would be voted for and liked more, when compared to an otherwise-comparable candidate. Further applying ELM to celebrity status as a peripheral cue, the study examined what, if any, differences existed between participants who had a high versus low need for cognition as well as differing levels of political involvement. However, the findings do not show that need for cognition or level of political involvement significantly increased the use of celebrity status as a cue.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipZwarun, Laraen_US
dc.language.isoENen_US
dc.publisherCommunicationen_US
dc.titleHollywood To Hilltop: Does Celebrity Status Act As A Peripheral Cue In Voting Decisionsen_US
dc.typeM.A.en_US
dc.contributor.committeeChairZwarun, Laraen_US
dc.degree.departmentCommunicationen_US
dc.degree.disciplineCommunicationen_US
dc.degree.grantorUniversity of Texas at Arlingtonen_US
dc.degree.levelmastersen_US
dc.degree.nameM.A.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record